I did my group
differences project on race and ethnicity. Luke and I both choose to read two articles
each. The first article I read was “Modifying Children's Racial Attitudes” by
Frances Aboud. Aboud made it clear that children are not unbiased at a young
age as many often assume they are, he on the other hand made the assumption
that children are very biased and need to be taught how to be unbiased before
they reach age 5 where it becomes less likely to be taught.
Aboud uses an intervention
strategy to see if children can be taught how to be accepting of other races. I
think this strategy is great and would like to see the results of its implications
on a wider scale. I agree with aboud that children are not culturally and
racial unbiased. I have worked in daycares for years and children will be
biased based on gender, age, money, race, etc. even as early as 2 and 3 years
old.
I also completely
agree with aboud’s view on being racially colorblind. Racial colorblindness has
often been thought of getting rid of racial biased, but it has done the
opposite. Children pick up on social cues very easily, they see mommy wearing
pink and getting her nails done with her girl friends and daddy wears jeans and
works on cars with his guy friends. Although no one told that child that girls
wear pink, they have picked up on it by seeing that daddy doesn’t wear pink.
The same process applies for other biased, including racial biased. Although a
parent may not say that a “black” man is bad, he may imply it by not speaking to
him, or sneering his nose up unconsciously. When children see these bias
behaviors occurring but are not taught why or how not to do them, they assume
they are the “right” way and follow in those footsteps. INSTEAD, parents and
teachers should explain differences such as sex, ey color, skin color, and then
explain that just because these differences ageist doesn’t mean that one person
is better than the other.
The other article
I read was titled “Teaching for Social Justice, Diversity, and Citizenship in a
Global World” By James A. Banks. Banks
argues that teachers need to worry less about academic matters and basic skills
and more about the global world. Students need to learn social justice,
diversity, and citizenship.
“I am very concerned about a conception of
literacy that defines it only as basic skills and ignores citizenship
participation in national and global contexts. Although it is essential that
students acquire basic skills in literacy, basic skills are necessary but not
sufficient in our diverse and troubled world. Literate citizens in a diverse and
democratic society should be reflective, moral, and active citizens in an
interconnected global world. They shut the knowledge, skills, and commitment
needed to change the world to make it more just and democratic. The world’s
greatest problems do not result from people being unable to read and write.
They result from people in the world from different cultures, Races, religions,
and nations been unable to get along and to work together to solve the worlds
in tractable problems such as global warming, the HIV/AIDS epidemic, Poverty,
Racism, Sexism, and war.”
The old thought
that assimilation was needed is no longer correct, instead multicultural
citizenship is necessary. Banks States that multicultural citizenship
“recognizes and legitimates the rights and needs for citizens to maintain both
their culture communities and national civic communities”. I agree with banks
very much, we as a society have put way to much effort on common core and
achievement scores and have forget that we need to put emphasis on our culture
as well as the other cultures that make up our culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment